铁路隧道洞口合理抗震设防长度

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2012.06.006

耿萍^1,2,
曹东杰^1,2,
唐金良^1,2,
权乾龙^1,2,
程邦富^1,2

基金项目:

国家973计划资助项目(2010CB732105,2011CB013605)

国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目(50925830)

计量
- 文章访问数:2025
- HTML全文浏览量:91
- PDF下载量:530
- 被引次数:0
出版历程
- 收稿日期:2012-02-28
- 刊出日期:2012-12-25

Rational Seismic Protective Length for Portal of Railway Tunnel

摘要

摘要:为确定隧道洞口段衬砌的合理设防长度,使隧道结构抗减震性能达到最优,以单线140 km/h、跨度6.4 m的铁路隧道为例,采用数值模拟方法,建立了隧道洞口段的动力分析模型;分析了围岩条件、衬砌物理力学参数等因素对地震作用下隧道洞口段衬砌内力响应的影响,讨论了围岩加速度响应和衬砌结构内力响应规律.数值模拟结果表明:距离超过洞口段3倍隧道跨度后,衬砌结构内力响应明显减小;振动台试验结果表明:洞口段抗震设防长度为3倍隧道跨度时,减震效果显著,验证了抗震设防长度的合理性.
- 铁路隧道/
- 洞口段/
- 抗震设防长度/
- 数值模拟/
- 振动台试验
Abstract:In order to determine the rational seismic protective length for tunnel portal and achieve the optimal earthquake-resistant performance, a dynamic analysis model for tunnel portal was set up to a 140 km/h single-line railway tunnel with a width of 6.4 m, the influences of surrounding rock conditions and physical and mechanical parameters of lining on the internal force responses of lining at tunnel portal under seismic action were analyzed. The acceleration response of surrounding rock and the distribution of lining internal force responses were discussed. The numerical simulation results show that lining internal forces will obviously reduce beyond 3 times the tunnel width far from the portal. The shaking table test carried out with 3 times tunnel width as seismic protective length at tunnel portal indicates that shock absorption effect is remarkable to verify the rationality of the seismic protective length.
- railway tunnel/
- portal/
- seismic protective length/
- numerical simulation/
- shaking table test

HTML全文

参考文献 (15)

周德培. 强震区隧道洞口段的动力特性研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,1998,18(1): 124-130. ZHOU Depei. Dynamic behavior of portal part of tunnel subjected to strong ground motion[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1998, 18(1): 124-130.

申玉生,高波,王英学. 强震区山岭隧道洞口段结构动力特性分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(增刊1): 3131-3136. SHEN Yusheng, GAO Bo, WANG Yingxue. Structural dynamic properties analysis for portal part of mountain tunnel in strong earthquake area[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(Sup.1): 3131-3136.

申玉生,高波,王峥峥. 强震区山岭隧道振动台模型试验破坏形态分析[J]. 工程力学,2009,26(1): 62-66. SHEN Yusheng, GAO Bo, WANG Zhengzheng. Failure mode analysis of mountain tunnel shake table test in high-intensity earthquake area[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2009, 26(1): 62-66.

李育枢,李天斌. 黄草坪2#隧道洞口段减震措施的大型振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(6): 1128-1135. LI Yushu, LI Tianbin. Large-scale shaking table test for vibration-absorption measures of portal section of Huangcaoping tunnel No.2[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(6): 1128-1135.

朱长安,高波,索然绪. 高地震区公路隧道地震动力响应分析[J]. 岩土工程技术,2008,22(5): 232-235. ZHU Changan, GAO Bo, SUO Ranxu. Analysis for seismic dynamic responses of highway tunnel in high earthquake intensity area[J].Geotechnical Engineering Technique, 2008, 22(5): 232-235.

蒋树屏,蒋华,王晓雯,等. 高烈度地震区公路隧道洞口段大型振动台模型试验方案设计[J]. 公路,2009(10): 245-249. JIANG Shuping, JIANG Hua, WANG Xiaowen, et al. Design test scheme of large-scale shaking table model for tunnel outlet of highway tunnel in seismic region with strong motion[J]. Highway, 2009(10): 245-249.

中华人民共和国铁道部. GB50111—2006 铁路工程抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2006.

中华人民共和国交通部. JTG D70—2004公路隧道设计规范[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2004.

铁道部基本建设总局. 铁路隧道新奥法指南[M]. 北京:中国铁道出版社,1988: 12-13.

郑永来,杨林德,李文艺,等. 地下结构抗震[M]. 上海:同济大学出版社,2005: 24-26.

梁建文,张浩,LEE V W. 地下洞室群对地面运动的影响[J]. 土木工程学报,2005,38(2): 106-128. LIANG Jianwen, ZHANG Hao, LEE V W. Effect of underground group cavities on ground surface motion[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2005, 38(2): 106-128.

HE Chuan, GENG Ping, YAN Qixiang. Seismic damage of tunnels in the great Wenchuan earthquake//Proceedings of International Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University Press, 2009: 563-567.

江南娱乐网页版入口官网下载安装. 铁路工程结构物抗震设计标准与方法研究:铁路隧道工程抗震设计标准与方法研究报告. 成都: 江南娱乐网页版入口官网下载安装,2011.

李林,何川,耿萍,等. 浅埋偏压洞口段隧道地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2011,30(12): 2540-2548. LI Lin, HE Chuan, GENG Ping, et al. Large-scale shaking table test for shallow-buried unsymmetrical tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(12): 2540-2548.

徐华,李天斌. 隧道不同减震层的地震动力响应与减震效果分析[J]. 土木工程学报,2011,44(增刊): 201-208. XU Hua, LI Tianbin. Seismic dynamic response and damping effect analysis of different buffer layers on tunnels[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(Sup.): 201-208.

施引文献

附加材料 (0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数:2025
HTML全文浏览量:91
PDF下载量:530
被引次数:0