Analysis of Ultimate Soil Resistance Beneath Cutting Curb Based on Cylindrical Cavity Expansion Theory
-
摘要:为解决目前刃脚极限土阻力计算方法所存在的不足，基于考虑剪胀效应的柱孔扩张理论，提出了刃脚极限土阻力的理论解答. 首先考虑刃脚基础单侧方向破坏的特点，将两个刃脚对称拼接成一个整体基础进行计算；其次利用柱孔扩张理论，通过分析刃脚底部土体在竖直方向的受力平衡求得刃脚极限土阻力；最后利用离心模型试验与现场监测对该计算方法进行了对比验证. 研究结果表明：与离心模型试验结果相比，当沉井下沉深度为36 m时，本文方法计算刃脚土阻力误差为6.6%，与现场实测结果相比，当沉井下沉深度为5 m时，本文方法计算刃脚土阻力误差为1.36%，当沉井下沉深度为10 m时，本文方法计算刃脚土阻力误差为19.5%，当沉井下沉深度为15 m时，本文方法计算刃脚土阻力误差为9.70%. 计算值与离心模型试验值、现场实测值均吻合较好. 本研究可为刃脚极限土阻力计算问题提供一个新思路.Abstract:To overcome the shortcomings of the conventional calculation method of the ultimate soil resistance beneath the cutting curb, a theoretical solution for the ultimate soil resistance beneath the cutting curb is proposed based on the theory of cylindrical cavity expansion considering dilation effects. First, characteristics of the unilateral failure of cutting curb foundation are considered and two cutting curbs are symmetrically spliced into an integral foundation for calculation. Then, the ultimate soil resistance beneath the cutting curb is obtained by using the theory of cylindrical cavity expansion and analyzing the vertical force balance of the soil at the bottom of the cutting curb. Finally, centrifugal model test and field monitoring are used to verify the calculation method. Results show that compared with the results of centrifugal model test, the error of the ultimate soil resistance beneath the cutting curb calculated by this method is 6.6% when the sinking depth of caisson is 36 m. Compared with the results of field monitoring, the error of the ultimate soil resistance beneath the cutting curb calculated by this method is 1.36%, 19.5%, and 9.70% when the sinking depth of caisson is 5 m, 10 m, and 15 m, respectively. The calculated values agree well with the centrifuge model test values and field measured values. This study can provide a new idea for calculating the ultimate soil resistance beneath the cutting curb.
-
表 1结果比较（计算值与离心模型试验值)
Table 1.Comparison of results (calculated values and centrifuge model test)
沉井下沉
深度/m计算刃脚土
阻力/（kN•m−1）实测刃脚土
阻力/（kN•m−1）误差/
%36 6583.8 6175.8 6.6 
下载:
导出CSV
表 2结果比较（计算值与现场实测值）
Table 2.Comparison of results (calculated values and field measured values)
沉井下沉
深度/m计算刃脚土阻
力/（kN•m−1）实测刃脚土阻
力/（kN•m−1）误差/
%5 2653.8 2690.4 1.36 10 3720.8 4622.5 19.50 15 4607.9 5102.5 9.70 下载:
导出CSV
-
周外男. 铜陵公铁两用长江大桥主桥施工关键技术[J]. 桥梁建设,2014,44(4): 1-8.ZHOU Wainan. Key techniques for construction of main bridge of tongling changjiang river rail-cum-road bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2014, 44(4): 1-8. 高宗余,梅新咏,徐伟,等. 沪通长江大桥总体设计[J]. 桥梁建设,2015,45(6): 1-6.GAO Zongyu, MEI Xinyong, XU Wei, et al. Overall design of hutong changjiang river bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2015, 45(6): 1-6. 张鸿, 刘鹏, 肖文福. 泰州大桥中塔深水超深巨型沉井施工技术[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30（增刊1）: 559-563.ZHANG Hong, LIU Peng, XIAO Wenfu. Construction technology of super-large deepwater caisson of middle tower of taizhou bridge[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30（S1）: 559-563. 徐伟,陈志强,徐赞云. 环形沉井刃脚踏面基础地基极限承载力分析[J]. 施工技术,2013,42(19): 56-60.XU Wei, CHEN Zhiqiang, XU Zanyun. Analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of ring cutting curb of open caisson foundation tread[J]. Construction Technology, 2013, 42(19): 56-60. BEREZANTSEV V G. Axially symmetrical limit equilibrium problems of loose materials (soil)[M]. Moscow: Gosstroiizdat, 1952: 8-12. 朱建民. 超大型沉井设计施工关键问题研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2012. SOLOV’EV N B. Use of limiting-equilibrium theory to determine the bearing capacity of soil beneath the blades of caissons[J]. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2008, 45(2): 39-45.doi:10.1007/s11204-008-9006-z 徐伟,陈志强,徐赞云. 环形沉井刃脚斜侧面基础地基极限承载力分析[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2013,41(7): 27-31.XU Wei, CHEN Zhiqiang, XU Zanyun. Analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of ring cutting curbs on open caisson foundation bevels[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Nature Science Edition), 2013, 41(7): 27-31. 闫富有, 时刚. 沉井下沉过程刃脚的极限土阻力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34（增刊1）: 80-87.YAN Fuyou, SHI Gang. Analysis of limiting soil resistance beneath cutting curb during sinking of open caisson. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34（S1）: 80-87. CHAKRABORTY M, KUMAR J. Bearing capacity factors for a conical footing using lower and upper-bound finite elements limit analysis[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2015, 52(12): 2134-2140.doi:10.1139/cgj-2014-0507 VESIC A C. Expansion of cavity in infinite soil mass[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 1972, 98(3): 265-289. BALIGH M M. Cavity expansion in sands with curved envelopes[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1976, 103(8): 931-932. YU H S, HOULSBY G T. Finite cavity expansion in dilatant soils:loading analysis[J]. Geotechnique, 1991, 41(2): 173-183.doi:10.1680/geot.1991.41.2.173 邹金锋,彭建国,张进华,等. 基于非线性Mohr-Coulomb强度准则下的扩孔问题解析[J]. 土木工程学报,2009,42(7): 90-97.doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2009.07.014ZOU Jinfeng, PENG Jianguo, ZHANG Jinhua, et al. Analytical solution of cavity expansion with the nonlinear Mohr-Coulomb failure rule[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2009, 42(7): 90-97.doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-131X.2009.07.014 郑俊杰,鲁燕儿,陈保国. 拉压模量不同的剪胀土体中的球孔扩张问题[J]. 岩土工程学报,2009,31(5): 675-680.doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2009.05.005ZHENG Junjie, LU Yaner, CHEN Baoguo. Spherical cavity expansion in dilatant soils with different tension and compression moduli[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(5): 675-680.doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2009.05.005 张明义,邓安福. 静压桩贯入地基的球孔扩张-滑动摩擦计算模式[J]. 岩土力学,2003,24(5): 701-709.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2003.05.006ZHANG Mingyi, DENG Anfu. A spherical cavity expansion-sliding friction calculation model on penetration of pressed-in piles[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2003, 24(5): 701-709.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2003.05.006 阮翔, 高广运. 大直径扩底桩竖向端承力解析解与试验分析[J]. 东南大学学报（自然科学版）, 2009, 39（增刊2）: 257-262.RUAN Xiang, GAO Guangyun. Analytical solution and test analysis of vertical tip bearing capacity of large diameter belled pile[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 39（S2）: 257-262. 李镜培,李林,孙德安,等. 饱和软土地层静压沉桩阻力理论研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2015,37(8): 1454-1461.doi:10.11779/CJGE201508014LI Jingpei, LI Lin, SUN Dean, et al. Theoretical study on sinking resistance of jacked piles in saturated soft clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(8): 1454-1461.doi:10.11779/CJGE201508014 YASUFUKU N, HYDE A F L. Pile end-bearing capacity in crushable sands[J]. Geotechnique, 1995, 45(4): 663-676.doi:10.1680/geot.1995.45.4.663 YASUFUKU N, OCHIAI H, OHNO S. Pile end-bearing capacity of sand related to soil compressibility[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2001, 41(4): 59-71.doi:10.3208/sandf.41.4_59 -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(7)/
表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数:826
- HTML全文浏览量:619
- PDF下载量:12
- 被引次数:0