基于半模型的高速列车远场气动噪声计算方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20210678

江南娱乐网页版入口官网下载安装牵引动力国家重点实验室，四川成都 610031

基金项目:国家重点研发计划（2020YFA0710902）；国家自然科学基金(12172308）；四川省科技计划（2023JDRC0062）

详细信息

通讯作者:
李田（1984—），男，副研究员，研究方向为列车空气动力学，E-mail：litian2008@swjtu.edu.cn

中图分类号:U266.2；TB533.2
计量
- 文章访问数:733
- HTML全文浏览量:240
- PDF下载量:64
- 被引次数:0
出版历程
- 收稿日期:2021-08-24
- 修回日期:2021-10-25
- 网络出版日期:2022-12-06
- 刊出日期:2021-10-27

Numerical Approach for Far-Field Aerodynamic Noise of High-Speed Trains Based on Half Model

State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

摘要

摘要:
随着高速列车运行速度的提高，其气动噪声问题逐渐凸显，如何准确快速预测高速列车的远场气动噪声成为关键. 利用半自由空间的Green函数求解FW-H方程，推导了考虑半模型时的远场声学积分公式，提出通过半模型的数值计算结果预测全模型高速列车远场气动噪声的方法；建立了全模型和半模型高速列车的气动噪声数值计算模型，应用改进延迟的分离涡模拟方法对不同模型高速列车表面的气动噪声源进行求解；通过风洞试验进行了全模型高速列车的数值仿真计算方法验证；对比分析了全模型和半模型高速列车周围的流场结构、气动噪声源和远场气动噪声特性. 结果表明：半模型高速列车数值计算得到的列车周围流场结构、气动噪声源以及远场气动噪声特性与全模型的一致；采用半模型计算会过高估计列车尾车流线型区域表面压力的波动程度和噪声源的辐射强度，但通过半模型预测整车模型的远场噪声平均声压级误差小于1 dBA；相比于全模型高速列车，半模型计算时的网格总量减少一半.
- 高速列车/
- 气动噪声/
- 半模型/
- 数值模拟/
- 噪声预测
Abstract:
With the increasing running speeds of high-speed trains, the problem of aerodynamic noise is gradually becoming more prominent. Determination of a method to predict the far-field aerodynamic noise of high-speed trains accurately and quickly has therefore become an important aim. The far-field acoustic integral formula for a half-model train is obtained in this work by solving the Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings （FW-H） equation using the Green’s function for semi-free space. A method is proposed to predict the far-field aerodynamic noise of a full-model high-speed train using the numerical calculation results for the half-model high-speed train’s aerodynamic noise. Numerical calculation models for the aerodynamic noise characteristics of high-speed trains are established with both the full model and the half model, and the aerodynamic noise sources on the surfaces of high-speed trains for the different models are solved using an improved delayed detached eddy simulation method. The numerical simulation calculation method used for the full-model high-speed train is verified using wind tunnel tests. The flow field, aerodynamic noise source, and far-field aerodynamic noise characteristics of the full-model and half-model high-speed trains are compared and analyzed. The results show that the flow field, aerodynamic noise source, and far-field aerodynamic noise characteristics obtained from the numerical calculations of the half-model high-speed train are consistent with those of the full model. Using the half-model calculations, the degree of fluctuation of the surface pressure in the streamlined area of the tail car and the noise source radiation intensity will both be overestimated. The far-field noise average sound pressure level error of the full model predicted using the half model is less than 1 dBA. When compared with the full-model high-speed train, the number of grid calculations performed for the half model is halved.
- high-speed train/
- aerodynamic noise/
- half model/
- numerical simulation/
- noise prediction.

HTML全文

图 1列车模型

Figure 1.Train model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2计算区域

Figure 2.Computation domain

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3计算网格

Figure 3.Computation mesh

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4列车表面y+ 分布

Figure 4.y+ distribution on train surface

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5远场噪声测点位置

Figure 5.Far-field noise measurement point location

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6风洞试验

Figure 6.Wind tunnel test

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7数值仿真与试验结果对比

Figure 7.Comparison of results between numerical simulation and experiment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8尾流区域涡结构分布

Figure 8.Vortex structure distribution in wake

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9不同截面处的时均流向涡量分量ω_x

Figure 9.Time-averaged streamwise vorticity componentω_xat different cross-sections

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10列车表面压力测点的时程曲线对比

Figure 10.Comparison of time-history curves of train surface pressure measuring points

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11列车表面压力测点的功率谱密度对比

Figure 11.Comparison of power spectral density of train surface pressure measuring points

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12列车表面声功率级对比

Figure 12.Comparison of sound power levels on the train surface

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13全模型高速列车远场噪声预测

Figure 13.Far-field noise prediction of full-model high-speed trains

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1网格独立性验证

Table 1.Independence verification for grids

网格	基础尺寸/m	边界层第一层高度/mm	网格量/万	时均气动力系数	误差/%
1	2.08	0.1	3291	0.214
2	1.92	0.1	3944	0.219	2.34
3	1.80	0.1	4652	0.221	1.84
4	1.76	0.1	5236	0.224	1.36
5	1.60	0.1	5878	0.222	−0.89

下载: 导出CSV

表 2表面压力测点对比

Table 2.Comparison of surface pressure monitoring points

测点	时均压力系数		标准差/× 10⁻³
测点	全模型	半模型	全模型	半模型
P₁	−0.1019	−0.1035	1.66	1.77
P₂	−0.0487	−0.0492	0.93	1.37

下载: 导出CSV

表 3远场噪声测点的平均声压级对比

Table 3.Comparison of average sound pressure level of far-field noise measurement points

模型	气动噪声源	平均声压级/dBA	差值/ dBA
全模型	整车声源	85.76
半模型	半模型声源 + 镜像声源	86.64	0.88

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献 (20)

[1]	李田,戴志远,刘加利,等. 中国高速列车气动减阻优化综述[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2021,21(1): 59-80.doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.01.003 LI Tian, DAI Zhiyuan, LIU Jiali, et al. Review on aerodynamic drag reduction optimization of high-speed trains in China[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021, 21(1): 59-80.doi:10.19818/j.cnki.1671-1637.2021.01.003
[2]	TIAN H Q. Review of research on high-speed railway aerodynamics in China[J]. Transportation Safety and Environment, 2019, 1(1): 1-21.doi:10.1093/tse/tdz014
[3]	朱自未,李牧皛,成功,等. 高速列车噪声源声功率与速度的函数关系[J]. 江南娱乐网页版入口官网下载安装学报,2020,55(2): 290-298.doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180023 ZHU Ziwei, LI Muxiao, CHENG Gong, et al. Functional relationships between sound Powers radiated from noise sources of high-speed train and its speed[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2020, 55(2): 290-298.doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180023
[4]	LU W T, WANG Y, ZHANG C Q. Research on the distribution of aerodynamic noises of high-speed trains[J]. Journal of Vibroengineering, 2017, 19(2): 1438-1452.doi:10.21595/jve.2017.18139
[5]	NOH H M, CHOI S, HONG S, et al. Investigation of noise sources in high-speed trains[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2014, 228(3): 307-322.doi:10.1177/0954409712473095
[6]	刘晓日,罗江泽,赵哲,等. 车头长度对高速列车气动特性与声场特性影响的数值分析及降噪研究[J]. 中国铁道科学,2018,39(5): 88-96.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2018.05.12 LIU Xiaori, LUO Jiangze, ZHAO Zhe, et al. Numerical analysis of influence of head length on aerodynamic and sound field characteristics of G-series high-speed train and research on noise reduction[J]. China Railway Science, 2018, 39(5): 88-96.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2018.05.12
[7]	张亚东,张继业,张亮,等. 高速列车动车转向架气动噪声数值分析[J]. 江南娱乐网页版入口官网下载安装学报,2016,51(5): 870-877.doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.05.008 ZHANG Yadong, ZHANG Jiye, ZHANG Liang, et al. Numerical analysis of aerodynamic noise of motor car bogie for high-speed trains[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2016, 51(5): 870-877.doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.2016.05.008
[8]	刘国庆,杜健,刘加利,等. 车端风挡类型对高速列车气动噪声影响规律的研究[J]. 噪声与振动控制,2018,38(2): 87-90,101.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2018.02.018 LIU Guoqing, DU Jian, LIU Jiali, et al. Investigation on the influence of inter-car windshield types on the aerodynamic noise of high speed trains[J]. Noise and Vibration Control, 2018, 38(2): 87-90,101.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1355.2018.02.018
[9]	LI T, QIN D, LI M, et al. Aerodynamic drag reduction of a high-speed train nose with bionic round pits[J]. Computing in Science & Engineering, 2019, 21(3): 31-41.
[10]	YAO Y F, SUN Z X, YANG G W, et al. Analysis of aerodynamic noise characteristics of high-speed train pantograph with different installation bases[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(11): 23-32.
[11]	IKEDA M, YOSHIDA K, SUZUKI M. A flow control technique utilizing air blowing to modify the aerodynamic characteristics of pantograph for high-speed train[J]. Journal of Mechanical Systems for Transportation and Logistics, 2008, 1(3): 264-271.doi:10.1299/jmtl.1.264
[12]	XIAO Y G, QUN Y, SUN L, et al. Longitudinal type-line optimization of high-speed train for low aerodynamic noise[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(6): 2494-2500.doi:10.1007/s11771-014-2204-0
[13]	李辉,肖新标,金学松. 基于简化模型的头车转向架气动噪声特性研究[J]. 机械工程学报,2016,52(8): 152-161.doi:10.3901/JME.2016.08.152 LI Hui, XIAO Xinbiao, JIN Xuesong. Investigation into aerodynamic noise characteristics of train head car bogie based on simplified models[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52(8): 152-161.doi:10.3901/JME.2016.08.152
[14]	IGLESIAS E L, THOMPSON D J, SMITH M G. Component-based model to predict aerodynamic noise from high-speed train pantographs[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 394: 280-305.doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2017.01.028
[15]	LIGHTHILL M J. On sound generated aerodynamically I: general theory[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1952, 211(1107): 564-587.
[16]	FFOWCS-WILLIAMS J E, HAWKINGS D L. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion[J]. Philosophical Transactions for the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1969, 264(1151): 321-342.
[17]	XIAO C H, YANG M Z, TAN C D, et al. Effects of platform sinking height on the unsteady aerodynamic performance of high-speed train pantograph[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2020, 204: 104284.1-104284.15.doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104284
[18]	刘加利,张继业,张卫华. 考虑地面效应的高速列车远场气动噪声计算方法研究[J]. 计算力学学报,2013,30(1): 94-100.doi:10.7511/jslx201301016 LIU Jiali, ZHANG Jiye, ZHANG Weihua. Study of computational method of far-field aerodynamic noise of a high-speed train considering ground effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2013, 30(1): 94-100.doi:10.7511/jslx201301016
[19]	李田,秦登,安超,等. 计算网格对列车空气动力学不确定性的影响[J]. 江南娱乐网页版入口官网下载安装学报,2019,54(4): 816-822.doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180503 LI Tian, QIN Deng, AN Chao, et al. Effect of computational grid on uncertainty in train aerodynamics[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019, 54(4): 816-822.doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-2724.20180503
[20]	ZHANG Y D, ZHANG J Y, LI T, et al. Research on aerodynamic noise reduction for high-speed trains[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2016: 6031893.1-6031893.21.

施引文献

附加材料 (0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

图(13)/ 表(3)

计量

文章访问数:733
HTML全文浏览量:240
PDF下载量:64
被引次数:0